Bridging the protection gap in Eastern Europe

For some families living in the former industrial regions of Eastern European countries, the social welfare payments offered by the Government are the most expected moment, each and every month. They are most helpful as a survival tool but, at the same time, combined with insufficient or even sometimes inexistent state-driven programs for tackling these issues, are considered by experts as a factor against actual change in both mentalities and lives.

Beside the subsistence funds coming from welfare, the same people theoretically benefit from public health insurance schemes and, at least in one country - even from a mandatory household insurance. In practice however, things are not always what they seem to be. There is however, in most Eastern European countries, an enormous protection gap, experts tend to agree, between the bottom layer of Government assistance and the upper one consisting of traditional insurance - unaffordable in these cases.

So we need to embark on a journey of discovery before even pronouncing the term "inclusive insurance" - as only by understanding the state of the regional insurance markets and the societal specificities one can find the right approach for bridging the protection gap. And inclusive insurance can be a real solution in this regard, as it was revealed during the Micro insurance & Inclusive Insurance: Opportunities and Challenges for Central and Eastern Europe and the Transcaucasian Region Conference (Ljubljana, Slovenia; 17 May 2017;

Looking at the larger CEE region: to put it mildly, there is plenty of room for development. The average insurance penetration in the entire region is about 2.50%, according to the latest data presented in the XPRIMM Insurance Report (, quite low in comparison with the EU average of 7,4% (Insurance Europe, 2015). Not to mention that we witness a constant downward trend in the last 5 years, meaning that insurance growth rate is lower, in average, than the economic growth in the region.

The relevant markets in the region are the usual suspects: Poland, with something like 40% of the entire premium production, the Czech Rep, Hungary, Romania and Slovenia. Slovenia also has the best performance in penetration terms (5.11%)

At the same time, the average insurance density in the CEE is 258 EUR/capita which is concerning if one look at the EU average, currently above 2.000 EUR (IE, 2015). But Slovenia stands out once more, with an insurance density closer to the European average (985 EUR/capita) - yet, lower than 5 years ago.

Why is the region different?

It is already common knowledge that purchasing power is still low, not allowing for increased spending on insurance products. In example, the average annual wage in the EU is around 18.200 EUR while in 7 of the CEE countries, according to the same XPRIMM Insurance Report, it is below 5.200 EUR/year. Nevertheless, CEE markets produce premiums of 31.3 billion EUR (2016) out of which 37% life, 33% motor, almost 10% property. Another regional specificity is that life insurance has a lower penetration than in more developed economies, not to mention property insurance, especially for NatCat risks. And it is when tragedy strikes, that those in low- and middle-income groups often lose their earning power and face immediate hardship.

Crop insurance has a very low penetration in most markets although is state subsidized - inefficient subsidizing system, high fragmentation of the agricultural land properties, rudimentary exploited for household consumption etc. while health insurance is underdeveloped in most countries as it is perceived as or really unaffordable for large masses of clients and dependent of the public health system reform.

Going back to the region, another factor that makes the region different: financial education is still "work-in-progress" (historical reasons, lack of political reforms etc.) not to mention that trust in the financial services industry is not always where it should be. Many countries have to fill in the gaps of 50 years of not properly accessing the more developed financial markets.

The potential is huge, but...

But local specificities need to be taken into account when building micro insurance or inclusive insurance operations. Most expertise comes from non-European countries from Africa, Asia of South America. Political, Economic, Social and Technological factors are games-changers. So the questions are: How to design inclusive insurance products?, How to engage with communities at grassroots and distribute? and How to ensure efficiency and good governance in the EU regulatory landscape?

Some major topics for discussion refer to the fact that mutuality and risk awareness are not embedded in the Central and Eastern European culture and that, as opposed to other regions of the world, there is a segment of the population that could potentially afford traditional insurance but, for various reasons, decides not to do so. This means that target markets for inclusive insurance need to be clearly defined, whether we are speaking about people on social welfare which need extra protection but can not afford it (or simply do not want it), disadvantaged communities without IDs and documents thus lacking access to any kind of financial services, young unemployed people that are looking for social guidance or about remote communities living in isolated places or nomadic/excluded minorities. All of these social categories require different approaches. For some of the communities briefly described above, Churches, City halls and Schools are often the gathering place therefore providing contact with the outside world besides mobile networks and television.

Bottom line: the region's target market for inclusive insurance needs to be segmented, most likely with the help of anthropologists and sociology experts, as part of a joint regional effort.

Regulation is key. or the regulators?

As it clearly emerged following the conference which triggered all these important discussions, the Solvency II Directive - which is at the center of Europe's regulatory landscape, is only part of the equation.

The Directive is said to be "agnostic" in relation to micro or inclusive insurance, according to Lieve LOWET, one of Bruxelles' most experienced lobbyists and Solvency II experts. "If micro-insurance is defined as specific insurance offered by an insurer to low-income people, it is covered by Solvency II". However, this Directive does not apply to (re)insurance undertakings excluded due to size (under 5 mil. EUR), nor to fully reinsured mutual nonlife. And it has to follow the proportionality principle both to the requirements for undertakings and to the exercise of supervisory powers. This means, and Lieve LOWET would agree, that it should not be too burdensome for insurers that specialize in providing specific types of insurance or services to specific customer segments, and it should recognize that specializing in this way can be a valuable tool for efficiently and effectively managing risk.

However, there is more to come from the regulatory side of things: the Insurance Distribution Directive, with the subsequent POG-Product Oversight and Governance Guidelines, Conflict of Interest, Suitability and Reporting to Customers provisions - are also elements that need to be considered. In example, POG will regulate in detail the design of insurance products and their distribution - and this is based on Solvency II as well as on the IDD. They have a close link to the system of governance under the Solvency II framework, requiring firms to introduce very explicit processes and measures with regard to the design, development and monitoring of new insurance products. How can all of these fit into the inclusive insurance ecosystem?

And of course, there is the IPID-Insurance Product Information Document that is mandatory to be presented before the conclusion of any for non-life insurance (as it is trying to fix consumer's level of engagement with disclosures, to help compare between products and to make customers focus less on the price and more the coverage). But can an inclusive insurance scheme comply and afford all of this while still offering the same level of consumer protection as classical insurance? This is also paramount!

One solution

One solution comes to mind: Regulatory Sandboxes developed by regulators and supervisors as a complement to the support offered by Governments to such initiatives.

As countries such as Spain or the UK, but not only, are already developing for InsurTech and digitalization. Why not national competent authorities from the region and beyond develop Inclusive Insurance Regulatory Sandboxes?

Because, although there is no definitive answer, something needs to be done: poverty reduction, resilience building and financial inclusion should be our top priorities . Bridging the protection gap is a necessary step for our future development. But are we doing enough for the future?

Related articles


CEE, FY2017: GWP and paid claims increased at the same pace: 11.5%

The CEE insurance market saw a 11.5% y-o-y growth in 2017, statistical data gathered by XPRIMM show. Overall, GWP amounted to EUR 36.12 billion. With a similar increase, paid claims reached almost EUR 22 billion. The forthcoming issue of the XPRIMM Insurance Report for FY2017, to be launched on May 14, will present in depth information in this regard.


SERBIA: New Law on Compulsory Traffic Insurance announced

By 2020, Serbia should adopt new regulation in the field of insurance, which would follow the requirements in the process of European integration. The biggest challenge will be the adoption of the new Law on Compulsory Traffic Insurance, to replace the current Law adopted in 2009.


Europe's future may lie in its pensions

The EU is set to introduce an entirely new class of pension products, according to a proposal by the European Commission currently under debate. Here comes the... PEPPs.


Allianz Risk Barometer 2018 - Business Interruption and cyber-related incident, top threats for companies globally; NatCat risks return on the top risk agenda

Evolving nature of risk, and rise in cyber-related incidents, means business interruption ranks as top threat for companies globally, according to 1,900+ risk experts from 80 countries, the latest Allianz Risk Barometer shows. On the other hand, while the economic state of the global economy seems to arouse less concern, the strong wave of Nat Cat events brought by the second half of 2017 has placed once again natural catastrophes and climate change up on the risk agenda.


S&P's: Introducing compulsory cessions could support Russia's domestic reinsurance market, or undermine it

In a recently published report S&P Global Ratings said that operating conditions for Russian reinsurers have become considerably more complex over the past few years In the agency's view, the market has become more concentrated, in part because of an increase in minimal capital requirements since 2012. The Russian reinsurance market lacks internal capacity and remains heavily dependent on reinsurance protection from developed markets.


Online insurance in Europe reached more than 100 billion EUR in 2016

Online and direct channels are the fastest growing business models in both life and non-life insurance industry in Europe. The market share of the online/direct channel business was, in 2015, 8.2% of the total business, while the total gross written premiums of this channel throughout all Europe reached 99.3 billion EUR.


S&P Global: Polish motor insurers face a decade of uncertainty due to retrospective bereavement damages claims

Over 12 months, average prices for Poland's mandatory motor third-party liability (MTPL) insurance have shot up by about 47%. S&P Global Ratings attributes part of this spike in policy prices to the rising cost of bodily injury compensation claims in Poland over recent yearsPolish motor insurers have also seen fierce competition and inflation in spare parts claims, reads a study recently published by S&P Global. Courtesy to S&P's, XPRIMM readers are exclusively offered access to the study's findings.



Zurich: leadership transition in EMEA business

Currently group CEO of AXA UK and Ireland, Amanda BLANC will also join the executive committee at ZURICH, with the handover scheduled to complete in the fourth quarter of 2018. BLANC is to succeed Gary SHAUGHNESSY as CEO of ZURICH Insurance's EMEA business.



Why should you participate at FIAR 2018?

With an exclusive list of professional speakers, 7 conferences and workshops analyzing current trends and issues on the re/insurance markets, as well as hundreds of bilateral meetings and networking opportunities, FIAR 2018 represents a key event on the business agenda.


What re/insurance professionals are already on FIAR 2018's list of speakers?

Specialists from ICMIF - International Cooperative Mutual Insurance Federation and PensionsEurope, representatives of national insurance associations from Austria and Turkey, as well as professionals representing SWISS Re, GEN Re and AUDATEX are just a few of the speakers who have already confirmed their presence at FIAR 2018 - The International Insurance-Reinsurance Forum.



LIVE: Moscow, Russia: The XXII International Reinsurance Conference

The XXII International Reinsurance Conference has started today in Moscow, organized by Delovoy Format, with the support of the Russian Insurers Association. XPRIMM, the traditional Media Partner of the conference, has launched on the occasion the latest edition of its Insurance Profile Russia, providing for 2017 insurance statistical data.



The 4th edition of the European Consumer Protection Conference: Main conclusions

The European Consumer Protection Conference, taking place on Thursday, 22 March, in Prague, brought into debate the consumer environment in the current European regulatory and economic landscape, the upcoming legislative changes that will benefit consumers and users of insurance and private pension products, as well as digitalization and the impact of technological advances in the field of financial services.


See all